By Richard Holdener, Photography by Richard Holdener

6. While we had the engine apart, we elected to upgrade the oiling system. Milodon supplie
In terms of the oiling system, we installed a new stock oil pump, but augmented the system with a Milodon oil pan, pickup, and windage tray. In preparation for Part 3 of this adventure, we welded a drain tube in the Milodon pan for our future turbo motor. We also replaced the factory injectors with a set of 75 pounders using the stock fuel rail. It was necessary to install spacers under the rail to make room for the taller injectors. As with the 5.7L cam test, we utilized a set of SRT8 exhaust manifolds feeding short extensions. Long-tube headers would help this combination substantially, but it was interesting to see the power produced with the stock manifolds. Another carryover from our original 5.7L cam test was the manual throttle body (converted from drive-by-wire). The motor was run with both the stock plastic truck and STR8 aluminum intake manifolds, and both managed to produce the same peak power (with both cams). This came somewhat as a surprise, as we expected the truck intake to offer more low-speed power but lose out on top compared to the SRT8. Run with the 260H-13 cam, the 370-inch stroker 5.7L Hemi pumped out 454 hp and 453 lb-ft of torque. True to form, torque production from the stroker exceeded 425 lb-ft from 3,900 rpm to 5,600 rpm. Best of all, the stroker improved the power output (over the 5.7L) throughout the rev range, offered improved idle quality (with the same cam), and looked just like the stock motor. The additional displacement increased the power output by 53 hp and 26 lb-ft over the 5.7L equipped with the same cam (the 5.7L produced 401 hp and 427 lb-ft in Part 1).
-

7. The stock 5.7L heads were shipped off to the flow experts at Total Engine Airflow for a
-

8. In preparation for the turbo (in next month’s Part 3), we replaced the factory injector
-

9. We once again relied on our stock throttle body. The drive-by-wire system was replaced

10. Lacking headers for this test, we again relied on the SRT8 exhaust manifolds. Dedicate
Despite our success with the stroker combination, we couldn’t help but wonder if the extra cubes might respond to wilder cam timing. Additionally, would the expected improvements in peak power come with a penalty down low? To find out, we installed a much more aggressive cam profile. The custom hydraulic roller cam from Comp Cams featured .589 lift (both intake and exhaust) and dual-pattern duration specs of 239/247 degrees at .050. The LSA checked in at an idle-friendly 114 degrees. As we experienced in Part 1, cam swaps on the Hemi were a breeze on the engine dyno. After the swap, the new cam offered some serious power gains, increasing the peak numbers from 454 hp and 453 lb-ft to 526 hp and 451 lb-ft. Impressive as the numbers sounded (and they were), they did come with a cost. The trade off for all that top-end power was a loss in torque below 5,100 rpm; as much as 38 lb-ft. Which cam offers more appeal depends a lot on the intended use. If you are looking for maximum acceleration, then the big cam is the way to go, but most street drivers might be better served by the smaller cam. Of course, you can always venture somewhere in between. Check back with us next month, when we take our boost-ready stroker and pump up the volume with a single turbo kit.
-

11. To maximize the power output of each combination, we relied on the Fast XFI/XIM manage
-

12. Run with the 260H-13 cam, the 370-inch Hemi produced 454 hp and 453 lb-ft of torque. T
-

13. The final test was to install a custom cam from Comp Cams. The hydraulic roller profil

14: Comp 260H-13 vs Custom Comp Cam-Scat 5.7L Hemi Stroker - The first thing you notice about the power curves is the amazing top-end charge offered by the custom Comp cam. Where the power leveled off with the smaller 260 cam around 5,500 rpm, the power kept climbing with the more aggressive cam timing. The cam swap increased the peak power output from 454 hp to 526 hp, but there was a price for all that extra horsepower. Though the peak torque output was nearly equal between the two cams, the smaller cam out-powered the bigger cam up to 5,100 rpm. Lower in the rev range, the smaller cam offered nearly 40 extra lb-ft. It all depends on where you want your power production.
By Richard Holdener
Enjoyed this Post? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, or use your favorite social media to recommend us to friends and colleagues!
stumble upon
facebook